PureSchmaltz

Rendered Fat Content

Why Project Community?

15 04, 15 14:51 Filed under: Work-MasteringProjectWork
TrueNorthTransparent1X2
I’ve been considering the work I’ve done, the work I understand. This piece might best explain what my workshop entails.

The Industrial Revolution brought with it some unintended consequences. We learned to structure work around teams, but alienated our broader communities. We learned to manage work by decomposing objectives into tasks and processes, but trivialized the very craftspeople we need to actually accomplish anything. We learned how to control execution, but at the cost of a deeper sense of discernible value. We could deduce one right, most efficient way, but lost sight of our purpose.

The Industrial Revolution also brought with it what Peter Drucker claimed was the single most profound innovation of the twentieth century, the professional manager. As organizations have flattened, the fiefdoms which justified the manager's role are disappearing, replaced by social networks more agile than formal departments and divisions. Most of the work accomplished by modern organizations is accomplished cross-functionally, by individuals mustered for the duration of an individual effort and endlessly reconfigured until people identify much more strongly with their current assignment's community than with any permanent manager, department, division, or company.

Further, social regulators rather than more formal regulations constrain and inform these fluid communities. They are guided by a set of ethics and principles more powerful than the direction of any overseeing management. Indeed, these cross-functional communities are wiser than any inevitably out-of-context manager could ever be. They do not take direction well because they do not need direction to perform well.

The guiding principles of work have changed along with the terms of engagement. We no longer produce long-lived operational processes, but ever-adapting ones. We no longer have the luxury of planning future action in great and definite detail. Planning itself has changed from something we do in advance to guide action to something we do continuously as a part of acting. Prediction, which was the very heart of Industrial Age management, has been replaced by the serial production of valuable results. We want results now. We will not wait. We expect to learn along the way. Our maps have become less useful than our compasses have become. We no longer plot discrete courses, but endlessly orient relative to our shifting goals.

Many trained in Industrial Age management complain about the uncertainty they are expected to contain. Are you using a sieve, which securely held the solid rocks of industrial objectives to transport today's fluid goals? On Time-On Budget-On Spec constitute fundamentally meaningless metrics in a world tenaciously focused upon creating perceived value. Employing Industrial-scale techniques on innovating efforts encumbers them. Well-intended and time-proven techniques for enforcing accountability undermine responsibility.

While the industrial age social architect might create a blueprint for this transformation, the emerging social communities have minds of their own. Whether these social minds perform coherently depends upon a shared set of principles, ethics, responsibilities, and understandings never considered by the industrial mindset. Unlearning what was supposed to work and preparing for accepting what does and will work in this new context is a challenge every organization (and every individual within every organization) faces. That our training and our experience poorly informs us for this shift might just be every organization's greatest competitive challenge.

The future will belong to those clever enough to create it for themselves. Adopting blessed 'best practices' will provide no more than competitive parity, which is no edge at all. How we cope with this dilemma will determine if we thrive.

The principles, ethics, responsibilities, and understandings necessary to perform under these radically different conditions cannot be acquired as Industrial Age skills were acquired. New techniques which employ real work rather than case studies, personal experience rather than cookbook conclusions, and impossible dilemmas rather than complex problems elicit the understandings needed to perform well now. We need learning experiences that involve the whole person, inform the working community, and utterly transform performance. We ask people to create their own personal learning objectives, then bring together a working community to consider and design the means for satisfying these objectives. I insist upon my clients delighting themselves rather than trying to delight them, since their ability to satisfy their own aspirations—often by surprising means—determine their future viability, not their ability to remember someone else's rules for the game.

©2015 by David A. Schmaltz - all rights reserved










Tags: ,

blog comments powered by Disqus

Good For A Goose





PureSchmaltz Archive Search


December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
© 2006-2024 by David A. Schmaltz all rights reserved

Made in RapidWeaver